<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why was WordPress 2.0 released when there were still so many known bugs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog/why-was-wordpress-20-released-when-there-were-still-so-many-known-bugs-310.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog/why-was-wordpress-20-released-when-there-were-still-so-many-known-bugs-310.htm</link>
	<description>Blogging tips and tricks, theme and plugin info, blogging software reviews, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:27:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Deaton</title>
		<link>http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog/why-was-wordpress-20-released-when-there-were-still-so-many-known-bugs-310.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Deaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog/why-was-wordpress-20-released-when-there-were-still-so-many-known-bugs-310.htm#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>All things considered, there are a few good points above. Firstoff, releasing software with known bugs is indeed a common thing, and everybody knows there will never be such a thing as bug free software, but there is a limit, and a limit to the type of bugs that can be left unfixed before release. A bug that might effect 1 out of 1,000 people is one thing, bugs like we&#039;re having with trackbacks or permalinks being broken in 2.0, however, are much worse.

WordPress does not have any organized form of QA at all. There is a testers mailing list, and nightly builds, and people are just expected to keep banging at them. With a community as large as that of WordPress, this is far from optimal, and part of the problem, and is a place where the developers need to step up. There are already proposals hitting the mailing lists for a more formalized QA, &lt;a href=&quot;http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-hackers/2006-January/003792.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-hackers/2006-January/003792.html&lt;/a&gt;

The FeedBack link for WP.com isn&#039;t practical for regular WP blogs though, there are just too many issues that may be mistaken as bugs or that really belong in the support forum to keep a feedback link in WordPress itself, the bulk would be far too heavy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All things considered, there are a few good points above. Firstoff, releasing software with known bugs is indeed a common thing, and everybody knows there will never be such a thing as bug free software, but there is a limit, and a limit to the type of bugs that can be left unfixed before release. A bug that might effect 1 out of 1,000 people is one thing, bugs like we&#8217;re having with trackbacks or permalinks being broken in 2.0, however, are much worse.</p>
<p>WordPress does not have any organized form of QA at all. There is a testers mailing list, and nightly builds, and people are just expected to keep banging at them. With a community as large as that of WordPress, this is far from optimal, and part of the problem, and is a place where the developers need to step up. There are already proposals hitting the mailing lists for a more formalized QA, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog/goto/http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-hackers/2006-January/003792.html"  rel="nofollow">http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-hackers/2006-January/003792.html</a></p>
<p>The FeedBack link for WP.com isn&#8217;t practical for regular WP blogs though, there are just too many issues that may be mistaken as bugs or that really belong in the support forum to keep a feedback link in WordPress itself, the bulk would be far too heavy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

